🚨 Google's AI is giving dangerous medical advice. 🏥 From wrong diets for cancer patients to incorrect blood test ranges. Here is what went wrong. 👇
Trusting the internet for medical advice has always been a
risky game, but Google’s attempt to make it safer using AI seems to have
backfired. The company’s AI Overviews feature—the generated summary box
that sits at the top of your search results—is under fire once again for
providing potentially dangerous medical recommendations.
The issue comes at a precarious time. While Google struggles
to sort out hallucinations in its search engine, competitors like OpenAI
and Anthropic are aggressively pushing their own AI models into the
healthcare space.
The Pancreatic Cancer Blunder
An investigation by The Guardian has highlighted some
alarming errors made by the AI when asked very specific medical questions.
Perhaps the most concerning example involved a query about
the diet for someone suffering from pancreatic cancer. Google’s AI
Overview reportedly advised users to avoid high-fat foods.
This isn't just a minor slip-up; it’s a dangerous
recommendation. Medical professionals frequently advise pancreatic cancer
patients to consume high-fat foods to maintain weight and caloric intake, as
the disease often prevents the body from absorbing nutrients properly.
Following the AI's advice could have "lethal consequences," as the
report notes.
Ignoring the Individual: The Liver Test Error
In another instance, the AI was asked about the normal range
for liver blood tests. The AI provided a generic set of numbers. The problem?
It completely failed to factor in critical demographics like nationality,
gender, age, and ethnicity.
Blood work ranges are rarely one-size-fits-all. A
"normal" reading for a 20-year-old male might be a warning sign for a
65-year-old woman. By providing a blanket answer, the AI could lead users to
falsely believe their test results are healthy when they actually need medical
attention.
The investigation also pointed out that the AI was
dismissing genuine symptoms related to women's cancer tests.
Google’s Response
When approached for comment, a Google spokesperson pushed
back, claiming that the examples being circulated were based on
"incomplete screenshots." They defended the feature by noting that
the cited links in the summaries came from reputable medical sources.
However, the issue isn't necessarily the source, but
the AI's interpretation of that source. A reputable article might say
"Avoid high fat unless you have pancreatic cancer," but the AI
could easily miss that nuance when generating a quick summary.
Interestingly, when The Guardian and Gadgets 360
staff members attempted to replicate these queries, the AI Overviews no longer
appeared. It seems Google has either manually disabled the feature for these
specific queries or patched the errors in real-time.
The High Stakes of AI in Healthcare
This controversy highlights a major disconnect. Google is a
general search engine, but it is being asked to perform tasks that require the
precision of a specialist. While OpenAI and Anthropic are developing specific
models fine-tuned for healthcare, Google's search AI is a jack-of-all-trades.
The danger lies in the placement. AI Overviews sit right
at the top of the search results. Many users see a confident-looking
summary in a blue box and don't bother clicking the links. They assume,
"Google said it, so it must be true."
As AI continues to creep into the medical field, these kinds of errors serve as a stark reminder: an algorithm doesn't know your medical history, your body type, or your specific needs. When it comes to your health, that "convenient" AI summary might just be too good to be true.
#GoogleAI #MedicalAdvice #AIHealthcare #OpenAI #Anthropic
#TechNews #GoogleSearch #AIOverviews #HealthTech

%20(2).webp)